To Pope of Vatican: That’s what Mohammad came with...

Praise to Allah the LORD of the universe and peace be upon his beloved Prophet Mohammad and upon his family and comrades and then:

The outraged statements by Benedict the 16^th the Pope of the Vatican inflamed the Muslims worldwide, the Pope took a quote from a book by a Byzantine Emperor during his dialogue with a Persian cleric saying that Mohammad didn’t bring something new to the world except "evil and inhuman things" like spreading his religion by sword (as the Pope claims). 

Then the Pope digressed to the "willing of God" between Islam and Christianity; he said that the willing of God in Islam is "absolute" but in Christianity it's filled with the Greek philosophy which considers the intellect as a factor in decisions.

 My reply to this Pope is divided into three portions:

(1) The Pope should condemn the excessive violent texts in the Bible before condemning Islam

 The Old Testament and the New Testament contain hundreds of violent texts (As they call it) that is not condemned by the Pope who says that Islam contains violence in its teachings!!

 Some of the texts in the Bible contain direct orders to kill women and children and even the cattle!!!!!

 Why the Pope ignored these texts? Here are some texts quoted from the Bible that demonstrate my point of view:

 In the book of Numbers [31: 16-17]

"Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him** But all the women children, that have not known man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves"

 And in the book of Joshua [6:21]

"And they utterly destroyed all that was in the city, both man and woman, both young and old, and ox, and sheep, and ass, with the edge of the sword"

 Where are the comments of the Pope on these texts? Or they are considered as "violent" texts only in Islam?!

 But even look what the bible refers to God [Isaiah 13:16] when he said:

"Their babes also shall be dashed in pieces before their eyes; their houses shall be spoiled, and their wives ravished"

 Where is the Pope from "dashing" the babies into pieces? Isn't that "inhuman" and an "evil" act?

 Some may say: that’s only in the Old Testament but the New Testament [Gospels] doesn't contain these texts

I reply: That is wrong 100%

 Look to what Jesus Christ (Peace be upon him) said about those who shall not accept him [Gospel of Luke 19:27 SVD]:

 "Lo! Bring those who don’t want me to rule them and slaughter them before me"

 Isn't that a use of "violence" in the name of faith which the Pope had condemned?

 Even Jesus him self in the Bible denied his coming for peace and said [Luke 12:51 SVD]:

 "Do ye think I came to give peace? Nay; but came to divide"

 So the Pope must confess that there are violent texts in the New Testament that he must condemn before condemning "Jihad" or he must be quite then; what would he like to choose?

(2) Will of God between Islam and Christianity

 The Pope said that the will of God in Islam doesn't yield to intellectual rules. I will reply with single evidence that proves this kind of mentality as the mentality of the Prophets of God and that the Philosopher mentality is rejected by the Prophets of God take Abraham (PBUH) as an example.

 When God ordered Abraham to sacrifice his son [Ishmael] Abraham had two options: either to apply God's commands without yielding the decision to "intellectual rules" or to do the opposite.

 According to Christianity way of thinking:

 -          Ishmael is the Abraham's first born

-          God commands   Abraham to sacrifice his firstborn

-          God doesn't love bloodshed in the name of faith

-          The vision Abraham saw in his dream contradicts fixed laws to God

-  Abraham shouldn't sacrifice Ishmael

 According to Islamic way of thinking:

 - Abraham should sacrifice his son

 And now, which way of thinking Abraham had chosen? The Christian way that the Pope has eulogized? Or the Islamic way? Indeed Abraham followed the right way of thinking and sacrificed his son immediately without yielding this decision to any intellectual rules; for that Allah rewarded Abraham by the sheep instead of his son.

 (3) What did Mohammad come with?How could the Pope of Vatican be so ignorant that he doesn't know what Prophet Mohammad came

He came with sincerity; he was known between the Arabs as Assadiq AlAmeen (The truthful the honest).

He came with faithfulness; he was faithful to his people; the Prophet used to send any gift he receives to a friend of his wife who died [Khadija] and says "Take this gift to that woman she was a friend of Khadija"

 He came with generosity; his servant Anas ibn Malek said "No one asked the Prophet for a matter and he said NO"

 He came with Justice; he never oppressed any people whether they were Muslims or infidels.

 And other pious and virtues the Prophet came with; if the Pope didn’t realize all of that then the plea has appeared now and he has no excuse, and I do swear that nothing prevents him from knowing the truth but his arrogance and insolence.

 And its enough for us that God said to the Prophet (Truly you are in a high moral state)

 That concludes my reply to the Pope and I hope all the matters are clarified now to all Muslims reading this article.

منقول من موقع لماذا الإسلام

http://www.whyislamsa.com/article.php?id=30